Bilingual Books, Dual Language Books, Multicultural Children's Books, Poster, CD Bilingual Books, Dual Language Books, Multicultural Children's Books, Poster, CD
Bilingual Books, Dual Language Books, Multicultural Children's Books, Poster, CD Sign Up for our FREE Newsletter! Home Families Teachers Librarians Booksellers News and Resources Customer Service About Language Lizard Contact Language Lizard Language Lizard Products Browse/Search by Title or Code Browse/Search by Age/Level Browse/Search by Product Type Search/Browse by Language

Race, Politics and the Middle School Cafeteria
by Ruth Kunstadter

For the first time, two serious presidential contenders are not white. One is African-American, and one is Latino.

But wait ... they're not entirely African-American or Latino, either.

They are biracial and bicultural.

And as a result, they are facing the same kind of slurs and scrutiny that have normally been reserved for middle school cafeterias.

And many of those slurs are coming not only from the "white table," but from within the ethnic communities themselves.

And why? For some, it's because they're African-American or Latino.

For others, it's because they're not African-American or Latino "enough."

This should come as no surprise to anyone who has worked in public education. But it certainly is interesting to see it played out on a national stage.

In our increasingly multicultural and multiracial nation, many children of bicultural marriages are never quite sure which box to check on official forms, or which table to choose in the cafeteria.

Depending on their last name, or how "ethnic" they look, some have the option of operating as "white." Others are immediately classified according to their skin color or last name.

But most, if not all, will ultimately straddle the two cultures. And they will spend an inordinate amount of time trying to convince people that yes, they are Latino and/or African-American (or any other ethnicity) -- and at the same time, yes, they are "American."

Criticism from both sides

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson has received criticism from both sides of the spectrum -- for being too Latino, or not Latino enough. Some claim he tried to hide his Latino roots behind his "gringo" last name. Others feel he flaunts his Latino heritage too much, or only at politically convenient times. Some fault him for trying too hard to capitalize on being the "Latino candidate," while others criticize him for running as an "American candidate, not a Hispanic candidate."

He speaks Spanish fluently and was chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus -- and yet a recent poll showed that many Latino voters still do not realize there is a Latino candidate for president.

Richardson's experience is echoed every day in middle school hallways and cafeterias across the nation. People want him to choose between one side or the other. What are you -- Latino or American? And what about you, Barack Obama -- are you black or white?

Obama, son of a black Kenyan father and white Midwestern mother, has been challenged on the same issues. Is he capitalizing on his blackness? Is he trying to "act white"? Is he too black, or not black enough? Too white, or not white enough?

In presidential politics, as in middle school cafeterias, there is overwhelming pressure to choose one side over the other. But the truth is, Bill Richardson and Barack Obama, like all bicultural or multicultural individuals, do not need to hide or deny -- or, alternatively, over-inflate -- one heritage at the expense of the other.

The two sides of their cultural heritage are not mutually exclusive.

Bill Richardson is Latino, and he is American. Barack Obama is both "black" and "white."

More and more Americans today find themselves living in that middle ground, drawing on two distinct heritages and creating a unique self out of the two. They don't know which table to join because they really represent three cultures: their mother's, their father's and their own.

And despite the fact that people on either side will always be pressing them to choose, the choice has already been made. They are from both cultures, and at the same time, they belong to something new.

Forcing us to choose

Realistically, most of us qualify as "multicultural" (Those genealogical DNA tests can hold quite a few surprises!). And we should stop trying to make our candidates -- or anyone else -- "choose."


Our goal, as a society, should not be to make people decide between one side of their heritage or the other or to accuse them of being too much of one side, or too deficient in the other. Our goal instead should be a celebration of both sides, and of the combination of the two.

We are not too Latino, or too African-American, or too anything. Neither are we "not Latino enough" or "not black enough."

We are America, and we have been a multicultural nation from our very inception. That is our strength and, increasingly, our future.

It's time for a new table in the cafeteria -- one that reflects our new reality.

And for once, our candidates reflect this reality, too.

Ruth Kunstadter of Montclair is an educator and founder of Chispa Productions (www.ChispaProductions.com), which creates multimedia materials that teach languages while celebrating multicultural heritage in the United States. She is author of the forthcoming book "The Bilingual Soul."

This article was first published in the Record on July 3, 2007. Reprinted with permission of author.


Home | Newsletter Signup | About Us | Become an Affiliate | Products | Product Reviews | Testimonials | News/Resources
Customer Service | FAQ | Press Room | Fundraising | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Site Map | Product Index |
Category Index | Contact Us
© 2005 Language Lizard, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website Design & Development by
Welcome to Language Lizard, LLC-Inspiring Kids Through Language! Welcome to Language Lizard, LLC-Inspiring Kids Through Language! Home Help View Wish List Log Out of My Account View Cart Contact Language Lizard About Language Lizard Families Teachers Librarians Booksellers Customer Service Home